<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FTC takes snap, crackle out of Kellogg cereal health claims</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nutrisuplaw.com/ftc-takes-snap-crackle-out-of-kellogg-cereal-health-claims/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nutrisuplaw.com/ftc-takes-snap-crackle-out-of-kellogg-cereal-health-claims/</link>
	<description>Arnstein &#38; Lehr LLP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:17:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The FTC Takes Snap, Crackle, Pop Out of Kellogg Cereal Health Claims</title>
		<link>http://nutrisuplaw.com/ftc-takes-snap-crackle-out-of-kellogg-cereal-health-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-2717</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Blog Archive &#187; The FTC Takes Snap, Crackle, Pop Out of Kellogg Cereal Health Claims</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nutrisuplaw.com/?p=1567#comment-2717</guid>
		<description>[...] View Source [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] View Source [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David A. Mark, PhD</title>
		<link>http://nutrisuplaw.com/ftc-takes-snap-crackle-out-of-kellogg-cereal-health-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-2706</link>
		<dc:creator>David A. Mark, PhD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 17:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nutrisuplaw.com/?p=1567#comment-2706</guid>
		<description>Nice post, as it confirms the FDA and FTC are policing hard on claims for cognitive or immune benefits, especially those directed to parents of young children.  

Another shoe may drop soon. The fourth International Conference on Polyphenols and Health, held in the UK in December 2009, saw many experts on this topic stating that many, perhaps all, of the health functions of polyphenols have nothing to do with antioxidant activity. If the FDA and FTC come to agree with this building consensus, many of the current label and marketing claims will be challenged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, as it confirms the FDA and FTC are policing hard on claims for cognitive or immune benefits, especially those directed to parents of young children.  </p>
<p>Another shoe may drop soon. The fourth International Conference on Polyphenols and Health, held in the UK in December 2009, saw many experts on this topic stating that many, perhaps all, of the health functions of polyphenols have nothing to do with antioxidant activity. If the FDA and FTC come to agree with this building consensus, many of the current label and marketing claims will be challenged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: nutrisuplaw.com @ 2012-05-21 17:30:03 -->
