<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Nutritional and Dietary Supplement Law Blog &#187; organic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nutrisuplaw.com/category/organic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nutrisuplaw.com</link>
	<description>Dietary supplements, nutraceuticals, functional foods and drinks, cosmetics, and the law.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:47:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Federal audit of standards could lead to crackdown on organic certifications</title>
		<link>http://nutrisuplaw.com/audit-lead-crackdown-organic-certifications/</link>
		<comments>http://nutrisuplaw.com/audit-lead-crackdown-organic-certifications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Ottolenghi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[USDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplement business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labeling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nutrisuplaw.com/?p=1088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[     

Following reports in the Washington Post that standards for classifying foods as organic had been relaxed, the U.S. Agriculture Department is launching an audit of its National Organic Program. The Post says that department thinks external scrutiny is needed to improve the integrity and reliability of the program.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mceTemp">
<dl id="" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 178px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><img src="http://www.livingoceans.org/files/Images/FAD/USDA_organic.jpg" mce_src="http://www.livingoceans.org/files/Images/FAD/USDA_organic.jpg" alt=" " height="168" width="168" title="Federal audit of standards could lead to crackdown on organic certifications" /></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd"> </dd>
</dl>
</div>
<p>Following reports in the Washington Post that standards for classifying foods as organic had been relaxed, the U.S. Agriculture Department is launching an audit of its <a href="http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/nop" mce_href="http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/nop" target="_blank">National Organic Program</a>. The Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/07/AR2009080703650.html" mce_href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/07/AR2009080703650.html" target="_blank">says</a> that department thinks external scrutiny is needed to improve the integrity and reliability of the program.</p>
<p>The issue at hand is standards. Is the program following internationally recognized requirements for accrediting and monitoring nearly 100 private certifiers? Those entities determine whether foods meet federal organic standards. The <a href="http://www.nist.gov/index.html" mce_href="http://www.nist.gov/index.html" target="_blank">National Institute of Standards and Technology</a> is set to begin the review in October. The results will be released at the end of this year or in early 2010, complete with recommendations for USDA action.</p>
<p>“We applaud USDA’s willingness to submit its organic program to the rigors of these international norms and believe this will pave the way for continued growth and success of the U.S. organic industry,” Robynn Shrader, a <a href="http://www.nationalorganiccoalition.org/" mce_href="http://www.nationalorganiccoalition.org/" target="_blank">National Organic Coalition</a> founding member and CEO of the <a href="http://www.ncga.coop/" mce_href="http://www.ncga.coop/" target="_blank">National Cooperative Grocers Association</a>, said in a statement released Aug. 6.</p>
<p>The audit comes about a month after the Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/02/AR2009070203365.html" mce_href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/02/AR2009070203365.html" target="_blank">reported</a> that definitions for organic foods had been relaxed. For example, synthetic additives can be found in 90 percent of organic baby formula.</p>
<p>&#8220;It will unravel everything we&#8217;ve done if the standards can no longer be trusted,&#8221; <a href="http://leahy.senate.gov/" mce_href="http://leahy.senate.gov/" target="_blank">Sen. Patrick J. Leahy</a> (D-Vt.), who sponsored the federal organics legislation, told the Post in July. &#8220;If we don&#8217;t protect the brand, the organic label, the program is finished. It could disappear overnight.&#8221;</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nutrisuplaw.com/audit-lead-crackdown-organic-certifications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bust by U.S. Marshals raises stakes for ingredient safety</title>
		<link>http://nutrisuplaw.com/bust-marshals-raises-stakes-food-safety/</link>
		<comments>http://nutrisuplaw.com/bust-marshals-raises-stakes-food-safety/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Ottolenghi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cGMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labeling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nutrisuplaw.com/?p=781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Get ready for the not-so-kind-and-gentle FDA when it comes to food safety. The agency took abuse from politicians and consumer advocates over its handling of peanut and pistachio contamination earlier this year. Possibly to avoid a third hit, the agency moved swiftly and without warning on May 7 when it sent U.S. marshals into a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 191px"><img src="http://www.usmarshals.gov/images/usms-seal-300.jpg" alt=" " width="181" height="182" title="Bust by U.S. Marshals raises stakes for ingredient safety" /><p class="wp-caption-text"> </p></div>
<p>Get ready for the not-so-kind-and-gentle FDA when it comes to food safety. The agency took abuse from politicians and consumer advocates over its handling of peanut and pistachio contamination earlier this year. Possibly to avoid a third hit, the agency moved swiftly and without warning on May 7 when it sent U.S. marshals into a warehouse of Memphis-based <a href="http://www.americanmercantile.net" target="_blank">American Mercantile</a> to seize $1.5 million in food ingredients.</p>
<p>The FDA found evidence in March of extensive rodent and insect infestation throughout the company’s warehouse, the agency said in a <a href="http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2009/NEW02012.html" target="_blank">news release</a>. American Mercantile did not clean up the mess, the agency said, so it obtained a court order to send federal agents to the company&#8217;s warehouse. They hauled away food products including sarsaparilla, spearmint leaves, cornstarch, sweet orange peels powder, licorice powder, sassafras and salt.</p>
<p>“FDA will not tolerate a company’s failure to adequately control and prevent filth in its facility,” said Michael Chappell, the FDA’s acting associate commissioner for regulatory affairs, said in the release. “The FDA is prepared to use whatever legal means are necessary and appropriate to keep potentially contaminated products out of the marketplace.</p>
<p>Tough action matched the words. Functional Ingredients <a href="http://www.npicenter.com/anm/templates/newsATemp.aspx?articleid=23980&amp;zoneid=41">reports</a> that the FDA did not issue a warning letter to American Mercantile before the raid.</p>
<p>The door-kicking has rattled some in the ingredients industry. &#8220;If there is anything to be learned from this, it&#8217;s that this is a very visible example of a system that needs improvement. Better communication is needed from FDA, third-party certifiers and the <a href="http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateA&amp;navID=NationalOrganicProgram&amp;leftNav=NationalOrganicProgram&amp;page=NOPNationalOrganicProgramHome&amp;acct=nop" target="_blank">National Organic Program</a> and vice-versa,&#8221; says Marty Mesh, executive director of <a href="http://www.qcsinfo.org">Quality Certification Services</a> told Functional Ingredients. QCS was due to re-inspect American Mercantile for organic certification, according to the article.</p>
<p>&#8220;The food and supplements industry can expect a lot more of this,&#8221; says Loren Israelsen, executive director of the supplements trade group United Natural Products Alliance, told the publication. &#8220;This is the new FDA, so wake up everybody.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now that the FDA has everyone&#8217;s attention, what are the best courses of action?</p>
<ul>
<li>Take health inspections seriously. Ignore an FDA or state agency evaluation and armed men may come through your door.</li>
<li>Keep warehouses and manufacturing facilities squeaky clean. Check vendors and demand documentation, not assurances, that they are following certified good manufacturing practices.</li>
<li>Communicate. Tell customers, regulators and certification agencies what steps you are taking to make sure that your food ingredients are uncontaminated. Post documents online that show your company and its vendors passed inspections.</li>
<li>Trust, but verify, as the Russian saying goes. American Mercantile says on its Web site that its manufacturing plant is GMP/FDA and pharmaceutical compliant, but Functional Ingredient could find no evidence to support those claims.</li>
</ul>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nutrisuplaw.com/bust-marshals-raises-stakes-food-safety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is Organic? Powerful Players Want a Say</title>
		<link>http://nutrisuplaw.com/what-is-organic-powerful-players-want-a-say/</link>
		<comments>http://nutrisuplaw.com/what-is-organic-powerful-players-want-a-say/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 08:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[USDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nutrisuplaw.com/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent article in the NY Times on the entry of large food companies into the organic foods business. The article mentions the First Circuit&#8217;s decision in Harvey v. Veneman in passing. For a more in-depth analysis from the organic industry&#8217;s perspective, click here. The article also refers to legislation in congress &#8220;specifying that certain artificial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/01/business/01organic.html">article</a> in the NY Times on the entry of large food companies into the organic foods business.  The article mentions the First Circuit&#8217;s decision in <a href="http://www.mindfully.org/Farm/2005/Harvey-v-Veneman-04-1379-26jan2005.htm">Harvey v. Veneman</a> in passing.  For a more in-depth analysis from the organic industry&#8217;s perspective, <a href="http://www.ioia.net/HarveyvVeneman.htm" class="broken_link">click here.</a>  The article also refers to <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/C?c109:./temp/~c109eNHP2b">legislation in congress</a> &#8220;specifying that certain artificial ingredients could be used in organic food.&#8221;  In general, a good (albeit basic) summary of the battle currently raging in the organic food industry.<!--c2675c196c89c74757bbfc2f622ded90--></p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nutrisuplaw.com/what-is-organic-powerful-players-want-a-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY Times: USDA about-face on Organic Products</title>
		<link>http://nutrisuplaw.com/ny-times-reports-on-usda-organic-products-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://nutrisuplaw.com/ny-times-reports-on-usda-organic-products-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[USDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nutrisuplaw.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We previously reported here about the USDA&#8217;s decision to back down from its ill conceived policy to refuse organic certification to non-food products. It appears that the NY Times has caught up to our news cycle here at nutrisuplaw.com and published an informative article on the issue. Click here (free registration required). Similar Posts:None Found]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We previously reported <a href="http://nutrisuplaw.com/?p=8">here</a> about the USDA&#8217;s decision to back down from its ill conceived policy to refuse organic certification to non-food products.  It appears that the NY Times has caught up to our news cycle here at nutrisuplaw.com and published an informative article on the issue.  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/20/fashion/thursdaystyles/20skin.html?oref=login">Click here</a> (free registration required).</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nutrisuplaw.com/ny-times-reports-on-usda-organic-products-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
