<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Food, Beverage &#38; Nutrition Law Blog &#187; Vincent Annunziata</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nutrisuplaw.com/author/vaglann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nutrisuplaw.com</link>
	<description>Arnstein &#38; Lehr LLP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:26:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and Energy Drinks</title>
		<link>http://nutrisuplaw.com/european-food-safety-authority-efsa-energy-drinks/</link>
		<comments>http://nutrisuplaw.com/european-food-safety-authority-efsa-energy-drinks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Annunziata</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[functional foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy drinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glucuronolactone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taurine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nutrisuplaw.com/?p=586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has adopted a scientific opinion (summary also available) on two ingredients commonly used in so-called energy drinks. Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA’s Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) concluded that exposure to taurine and d-glucuronolactone through regular consumption of energy drinks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753812_home.htm"><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 3px;" title="energy drinks" src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/06/19/health/19drinks.span.jpg" alt="19drinks.span The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and Energy Drinks" width="298" height="139" />The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)</a> has adopted a <a href="http://www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/Scientific_Opinion/ans_ej935_Taurine%20and%20D-glucuronolactone_op_en.pdf?ssbinary=true" target="_blank">scientific opinion</a> (<a href="http://www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/Scientific_Opinion/ans_ej935_Taurine%20and%20D-glucuronolactone_sum_en.pdf?ssbinary=true" target="_blank">summary also available</a>) on two ingredients commonly used in so-called energy drinks. Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA’s Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) concluded that exposure to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taurine" target="_blank">taurine</a> and d-glucuronolactone through regular consumption of energy drinks was not of safety concern.</p>
<p>Taurine and d-glucuronolactone occur as natural ingredients in food, and are normal human metabolites. They are also usually used at much higher levels and in combination with different ingredients in energy drinks. The new data confirmed a No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) of 1,000mg per kilogram of bodyweight per day for both substances.  Read the press release <a href="http://www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753812_1211902328128.htm">here.<br />
</a></p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nutrisuplaw.com/european-food-safety-authority-efsa-energy-drinks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBB refers supplement firm to FDA, FTC for ad investigation</title>
		<link>http://nutrisuplaw.com/545/</link>
		<comments>http://nutrisuplaw.com/545/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Annunziata</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weight loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misleading claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[substantiation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nutrisuplaw.com/?p=545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Advertising Division (NAD) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus (BBB) is referring advertising for the dietary supplement Colotox, from Phoenix-based Central Coast Nutraceuticals Inc., to the FDA and FTC for review.  Under its National Advertising Review Council (NARC) program, NAD had asked the company for substantiation of certain claims for its product, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 2px;" title="colotox" src="http://www.coloncleanseassociation.com/images/colotox.jpg" alt="colotox BBB refers supplement firm to FDA, FTC for ad investigation" width="100" height="166" />The National Advertising Division <a href="http://www.nadreview.org/start.aspx">(NAD</a><a href="http://www.nadreview.org/start.aspx">)</a> of the Council of Better Business Bureaus (BBB) is referring advertising for the dietary supplement Colotox, from Phoenix-based Central Coast Nutraceuticals Inc., to the FDA and FTC for review.  Under its National Advertising Review Council (NARC) program, NAD had asked the company for substantiation of certain claims for its product, but received no response from Central Coast.</p>
<p>Claims for Colotox addressed the product’s ability to “remove toxic buildup,” “detoxify your organs” and “lose excess weight” as well as helping to relieve “ailments” including low energy, bloating and excess weight. NAD sought additional substantiation for implied claims related to colon cancer prevention. Read the entire <a href="http://www.nadreview.org/DocView.aspx?DocumentID=7166">press release</a></p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nutrisuplaw.com/545/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mercury and High-Fructose Corn Syrup</title>
		<link>http://nutrisuplaw.com/mercury-highfructose-corn-syrup/</link>
		<comments>http://nutrisuplaw.com/mercury-highfructose-corn-syrup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 02:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Annunziata</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hfcs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nutrisuplaw.com/?p=504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A report published on the web site of the Minneapolis-based nonprofit Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP), http://www.iatp.org indicates some well-known foods and drinks rich in high-fructose corn syrup may contain detectable levels of mercury. This report comes on the heels of a new study published in the journal of Environmental Health, http://www.ehjournal.net/content/pdf/1476-069x-8-2.pdf which shows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="hfcs" src="http://i2.cdn.turner.com/money/galleries/2008/fsb/0804/gallery.forbidden_foods.fsb/images/hfcs.ce.jpg" alt="hfcs.ce Mercury and High Fructose Corn Syrup" width="160" height="215" /></p>
<p>A report published on the web site of the Minneapolis-based nonprofit Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP), <a href="http://www.iatp.org/">http://www.iatp.org</a> indicates some well-known  foods and drinks rich in high-fructose corn syrup may contain detectable levels of mercury.</p>
<p>This report comes on the heels of a new study published in the journal of <em>Environmental Health</em>, <a href="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/pdf/1476-069x-8-2.pdf">http://www.ehjournal.net/content/pdf/1476-069x-8-2.pdf</a> which shows mercury in some samples of commercial high-fructose corn syrup tested in 2005.</p>
<p>To read the entire IATP report <a href="http://www.healthobservatory.org/library.cfm?refid=105026">click here</a>.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the website <a href="http://hfcsfact.com" target="_blank">HFCSFacts.com</a> begs to differ.  The site, titled &#8220;The Truth About High Fructose Corn Syrup,&#8221; offers a counterpoint in its document entitled <a href="http://www.hfcsfacts.com/HFCS-Mercury-Study-Outdated.html?utm_source=Google&amp;utm_medium=ppc&amp;utm_campaign=Mercury%20Myth&amp;gclid=CLLV4-C2xJgCFQQhnAodfExN1g" target="_blank">Mercury Study Seriously Flawed and Outdated; Fails to Meet Standards for Scientific Research. </a>The organization is even running Google AdWords ads with links directly to documents challenging the mecury study.</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nutrisuplaw.com/mercury-highfructose-corn-syrup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Listing of Color Additives: FDA Final Rule</title>
		<link>http://nutrisuplaw.com/listing-color-additives-fda-final-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://nutrisuplaw.com/listing-color-additives-fda-final-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Annunziata</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cosmeceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carmine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[color additives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labeling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nutrisuplaw.com/?p=391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is revising its requirements for cochineal extract and carmine by requiring their declaration by name on the label of all food and cosmetic products that contain these color additives. This final rule responds to reports of severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, to cochineal extract-containing food and carmine-containing food and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.fda.gov" target="_blank">Food and Drug Administration (FDA)</a> is revising its requirements for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carmine" target="_blank">cochineal extract and carmine</a> by requiring their declaration by name on the label of all food and cosmetic products that contain these color additives.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 243px"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carmine"><img title="carmine" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f9/Carminic_acid_structure.png/233px-Carminic_acid_structure.png" alt="233px Carminic acid structure Listing of Color Additives: FDA Final Rule" width="233" height="111" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">carminic acid</p></div>
<p>This final rule responds to reports of severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, to cochineal extract-containing food and carmine-containing food and cosmetics and will allow consumers who are allergic to these color additives to identify and thus avoid products that contain these color additives.  This action also responds to a <a href="http://www.cspinet.org/new/200901055.html" target="_blank">citizen petition</a> submitted by the <a href="http://cspinet.org" target="_blank">Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI)</a>.</p>
<p>To read the Federal Register notice,<a href="http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~lrd/fr09015a.html"> click here.</a></p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nutrisuplaw.com/listing-color-additives-fda-final-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal District Court Orders Dietary Supplement Marketers To Pay</title>
		<link>http://nutrisuplaw.com/federal-district-court-orders-dietary-supplement-marketers-to-pay/</link>
		<comments>http://nutrisuplaw.com/federal-district-court-orders-dietary-supplement-marketers-to-pay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Annunziata</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weight loss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nutrisuplaw.com/?p=325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal district court has ordered the marketers of three dietary supplements (Thermalean, Lipodrene, and Spontane-ES) to pay more than $15 million for deceiving consumers about the products’ safety and effectiveness. The court imposed the final monetary judgment and permanent prohibitions against the marketers in December 2008, after granting the Federal Trade Commission’s motion for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal district court has ordered the marketers of three dietary supplements (Thermalean, Lipodrene, and Spontane-ES) to pay more than $15 million for deceiving consumers about the products’ safety and effectiveness. The court imposed the final monetary judgment and permanent prohibitions against the marketers in December 2008, after granting the Federal Trade Commission’s motion for summary judgment last June. To read the press release, <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/01/nug.shtm">click here</a></p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nutrisuplaw.com/federal-district-court-orders-dietary-supplement-marketers-to-pay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better Business Bureau Issues Acai-berry Warning</title>
		<link>http://nutrisuplaw.com/better-business-bureau-issues-acai-berry-warning/</link>
		<comments>http://nutrisuplaw.com/better-business-bureau-issues-acai-berry-warning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Annunziata</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebrity endorsements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misleading ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nutrisuplaw.com/?p=299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Better Business Bureau has issued a nationwide warning cautioning consumers to be suspicious of online ads relying on celebrity endorsements to sell acai berry-related weight loss products. The acai berry has been credited by supplement companies with fighting cancer and other diseases.  The acai berry comes from the acai palm. According to Steve Cox, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Better Business Bureau has issued a nationwide warning cautioning consumers to be <span class="ResultBody">suspicious</span> of online ads relying on celebrity endorsements to sell acai berry-related weight loss products.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 153px"><img title="acai palm" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9a/A%C3%A7ai_na_beira_do_rio.jpg/180px-A%C3%A7ai_na_beira_do_rio.jpg" alt="180px A%C3%A7ai na beira do rio Better Business Bureau Issues Acai berry Warning" width="143" height="191" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Acai Palm</p></div>
<p>The acai berry has been credited by supplement companies with fighting cancer and other diseases.  The acai berry comes from the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A%C3%A7a%C3%AD_Palm">acai palm</a>.</p>
<p>According to Steve Cox, BBB spokesperson, “many businesses across the country are using the same selling model for their acai products: they lure customers in with celebrity endorsements and free trial offers, and then lock them in by making it extremely difficult to cancel the automatic delivery of more acai products every month.” To read the press release,<a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.nadreview.org');" href="http://us.bbb.org/WWWRoot/SitePage.aspx?site=113&amp;id=1869d6a9-82aa-49a1-8419-40a8251fa916&amp;art=8493" target="_blank"> click here</a></p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nutrisuplaw.com/better-business-bureau-issues-acai-berry-warning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California&#8217;s Attorney General Joins Agreement Forcing Airborne to Stop Marketing its Products as a Cure for the Common Cold</title>
		<link>http://nutrisuplaw.com/californias-attorney-general-joins-agreement-forcing-airborne-to-stop-marketing-its-products-as-a-cure-for-the-common-cold/</link>
		<comments>http://nutrisuplaw.com/californias-attorney-general-joins-agreement-forcing-airborne-to-stop-marketing-its-products-as-a-cure-for-the-common-cold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Annunziata</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common cold cure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nutrisuplaw.com/?p=282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[California Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. recently joined with 32 other state attorneys general in announcing a landmark $7 million settlement with Airborne, Inc. that forces the company to stop advertisements that “dramatically misrepresented” its dietary supplements as cold remedies. “Airborne dramatically misrepresented its products as cold remedies without any scientific evidence to back [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="airborne" src="http://theconsumerlink.com/imagesEdp/AIRBORNE/p78649b.jpg" alt="p78649b Californias Attorney General Joins Agreement Forcing Airborne to Stop Marketing its Products as a Cure for the Common Cold" width="250" height="250" /></p>
<p>California Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. recently joined with 32 other state attorneys general in announcing a landmark $7 million settlement with Airborne, Inc. that forces the company to stop advertisements that “dramatically misrepresented” its dietary supplements as cold remedies.</p>
<p>“Airborne dramatically misrepresented its products as cold remedies without any scientific evidence to back up its claims,” Attorney General Brown said. “Under this agreement, the company will stop advertisements that suggest that its products are a cure for the common cold.”</p>
<p>Airborne began selling its products as a cold remedy on the Internet around July 2000 and on television in 2004. In its advertisements, Airborne featured people suffering from cold and flu symptoms and made unsupported statements suggesting its products were a cure for the common cold. To read the news release,<a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.nadreview.org');" href="http://ag.ca.gov/newsalerts/release.php?id=1639&amp;" target="_blank"> click here.</a></p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nutrisuplaw.com/californias-attorney-general-joins-agreement-forcing-airborne-to-stop-marketing-its-products-as-a-cure-for-the-common-cold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chronically ill patients and homeopathy</title>
		<link>http://nutrisuplaw.com/chronically-ill-patients-and-homeopathy/</link>
		<comments>http://nutrisuplaw.com/chronically-ill-patients-and-homeopathy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Annunziata</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[homeopathic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nutrisuplaw.com/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent European study found patients using homeopathic remedies over an eight year period showed substantial improvements in their physical and mental health. The multicenter, cohort study looked at 3,709 patients from 103 homeopathic primary care practices in Germany and Switzerland.  Improvements in conditions such as headache and allergic rhinitis in adults and atopic dermatitis [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent European study found patients using homeopathic remedies over an eight year period showed substantial improvements in their physical and mental health.</p>
<p>The multicenter, cohort study looked at 3,709 patients from 103 homeopathic primary care practices in Germany and Switzerland.  Improvements in conditions such as headache and allergic rhinitis in adults and atopic dermatitis and infections in children were common, but more significant in younger patients, females, and those with the greatest disease severity at baseline.</p>
<p>The authors did note that patients were allowed to use conventional and other complementary therapies during the course of the study and that the observed improvements cannot be attributed to homeopathic treatment alone.</p>
<p><em>BMC Public Health. 2008 Dec 17;8(1):413. </em>To read the abstract and obtain the full text, <a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/8/413/abstract" target="_blank">click here.</a></p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nutrisuplaw.com/chronically-ill-patients-and-homeopathy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDA warns Coca-Cola over nutritional claims for Diet Coke Plus</title>
		<link>http://nutrisuplaw.com/fda-warns-coca-cola-over-nutritional-claims-for-diet-coke-plus/</link>
		<comments>http://nutrisuplaw.com/fda-warns-coca-cola-over-nutritional-claims-for-diet-coke-plus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 14:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Annunziata</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functional foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functional drinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warning letters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nutrisuplaw.com/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Food and Drug Administration issued a warning letter to The Coca-Cola Company, objecting to the labeling of their Diet Coke Plus product which describes the drink as &#8220;Diet Coke with Vitamins and Minerals.&#8221; Regulators said the beverage does not have enough nutrients to justify the use of the word &#8220;plus&#8221; in its name. According [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="diet coke plus" src="http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/presscenter/img/imagebrands/downloads/lg_diet_coke_plus.jpg" alt="lg diet coke plus FDA warns Coca Cola over nutritional claims for Diet Coke Plus" width="47" height="144" />The Food and Drug Administration issued a warning letter to The Coca-Cola Company, objecting to the labeling of their Diet Coke Plus product which describes the drink as &#8220;Diet Coke with Vitamins and Minerals.&#8221;</p>
<p>Regulators said the beverage does not have enough nutrients to justify the use of the word &#8220;plus&#8221; in its name. According to the agency, foods labeled &#8220;plus&#8221; must have at least 10 percent more nutrients than comparable products. Additionally, the FDA said it is inappropriate to add extra nutrients to &#8220;snack foods such as carbonated beverages.&#8221; To read the complete warning letter <a href="http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/2008/ucm1048050.htm" target="_blank">click here </a>.</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nutrisuplaw.com/fda-warns-coca-cola-over-nutritional-claims-for-diet-coke-plus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adverse Event Reporting (AER) Label Compliance</title>
		<link>http://nutrisuplaw.com/adverse-event-reporting-aer-label-compliance/</link>
		<comments>http://nutrisuplaw.com/adverse-event-reporting-aer-label-compliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Annunziata</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adverse event reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deadline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labeing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nutrisuplaw.com/?p=257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although Section 403(y) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFD&#38;C Act) (21 U.S.C. 343(y), does not require a dietary supplement label to include anything other than a domestic address or phone number for the responsible person, the FDA recommends that the label also bear a clear, prominent statement informing consumers that the domestic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables /> <w:SnapToGridInCell /> <w:WrapTextWithPunct /> <w:UseAsianBreakRules /> <w:UseFELayout /> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if !mso]><span class="mceItemObject"   classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id=ieooui></span> <mce:style><!<br />
st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }<br />
--> <!--[endif]--></p>
<p><!--[if gte mso 10]> <mce:style><!<br />
/* Style Definitions */<br />
table.MsoNormalTable<br />
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";<br />
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;<br />
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;<br />
mso-style-noshow:yes;<br />
mso-style-parent:"";<br />
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;<br />
mso-para-margin:0in;<br />
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;<br />
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;<br />
font-size:10.0pt;<br />
font-family:"Times New Roman";}<br />
--> <!--[endif]-->Although <span style="color: black;"><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <u2:WordDocument> <u2:View>Normal</u2:View> <u2:Zoom>0</u2:Zoom> <u2:Compatibility> <u2:BreakWrappedTables /> <u2:SnapToGridInCell /> <u2:WrapTextWithPunct /> <u2:UseAsianBreakRules /> <u2:UseFELayout /> </u2:Compatibility> <u2:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</u2:BrowserLevel> </u2:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]-->Section 403(y) of the <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <u3:WordDocument> <u3:View>Normal</u3:View> <u3:Zoom>0</u3:Zoom> <u3:Compatibility> <u3:BreakWrappedTables /> <u3:SnapToGridInCell /> <u3:WrapTextWithPunct /> <u3:UseAsianBreakRules /> <u3:UseFELayout /> </u3:Compatibility> <u3:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</u3:BrowserLevel> </u3:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]-->Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (</span><span style="color: black;">FFD</span><span style="color: black;">&amp;C Act) (21 U.S.C. 343(y), </span><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <u4:WordDocument> <u4:View>Normal</u4:View> <u4:Zoom>0</u4:Zoom> <u4:Compatibility> <u4:BreakWrappedTables /> <u4:SnapToGridInCell /> <u4:WrapTextWithPunct /> <u4:UseAsianBreakRules /> <u4:UseFELayout /> </u4:Compatibility> <u4:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</u4:BrowserLevel> </u4:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]-->does not require a dietary supplement label to include anything other than a domestic address or phone number for the responsible person, the FDA recommends that the label also bear a clear, prominent statement informing consumers that the domestic address or phone number is for reporting serious adverse events associated with use of the product.</p>
<p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <u5:WordDocument> <u5:View>Normal</u5:View> <u5:Zoom>0</u5:Zoom> <u5:Compatibility> <u5:BreakWrappedTables /> <u5:SnapToGridInCell /> <u5:WrapTextWithPunct /> <u5:UseAsianBreakRules /> <u5:UseFELayout /> </u5:Compatibility> <u5:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</u5:BrowserLevel> </u5:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]-->Under section 3(d)(2) of the Dietary Supplement and Nonprescription Drug Consumer Protection Act, the labeling requirements of section 403(y) ofthe FFD&amp;C Act apply to all dietary supplements labeled on or after December 22, 2007. Therefore, these labeling requirements are already in effect. However, FDA intends to exercise enforcement discretion for the new labeling requirements until January 1, 2010.</p>
<p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <u6:WordDocument> <u6:View>Normal</u6:View> <u6:Zoom>0</u6:Zoom> <u6:Compatibility> <u6:BreakWrappedTables /> <u6:SnapToGridInCell /> <u6:WrapTextWithPunct /> <u6:UseAsianBreakRules /> <u6:UseFELayout /> </u6:Compatibility> <u6:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</u6:BrowserLevel> </u6:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]-->FDA would have no objection to a firm&#8217;s combining the recommended statement with language informing consumers that the domestic address or phone number on the label may also be used for other purposes, as long as the information provided is not false or misleading. For example, a dual-purpose label statement might be &#8220;To report a serious adverse event or obtain product information, contact. .. &#8221; or other similar language.</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nutrisuplaw.com/adverse-event-reporting-aer-label-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: nutrisuplaw.com @ 2012-05-17 19:52:50 -->
